Section 28 of the Public Audit Act No. 11 of 2008 provides mandate to the Controller and Auditor General to carry-out Performance or Value-for-Money Audit for the purposes of establishing the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of any expenditure or use of public resources by Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), Local Government Authorities (LGAs) and Public Authorities and other Bodies.
According to the Performance Audit Principles as stated in ISSAI 300, performance auditing is defined as an independent, objective and reliable examination of whether government undertakings, systems, operations, programmes, activities or organisations are operating in accordance with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness and whether there is room for improvement.
Economy, efficiency and effectiveness (known as 3Es) form the theoretical platform for the perspectives and types of problems that are addressed in performance auditing. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions describes the concepts as follows:
Economy: The principle of economy means minimising the costs of resources. The resources used should be available in due time, in and appropriate quantity and quality and at the best price
Efficiency: The principle of efficiency means getting the most from available resources. It is concerned with the relationship between resources employed and outputs delivered in terms of quantity, quality and timing
Effectiveness: The principle of effectiveness concerns meeting the objectives set and achieving the intended results
There are three types of audit reports that are produced by NAO. These are
- Individual Performance Audit Reports;
- General Performance Reports; and
- Follow-up Reports